No, I'm not humming a Tina Turner favorite.
And the quick response is certainly "Love has everything to do with it."
What am I writing about?
Well, last weekend a reading group gathered to discuss a short story entitled "The Book of Martha" by speculative (science) fiction writer Octavia Butler. If you know Butler at all, you know she wrote some fairly wild yet engaging fiction that involved everything from time travel back to a southern plantation during slavery, and vampire-like human-sort-of people who have populated the earth, to novels on how religion in America can lead to disturbing and distorted rather than Utopian possibilities.
And then there's "The Book of Martha"--
It seems a West Coast writer, who loves her craft, has died-- she thinks; though she wonders if she's gone nuts or is somehow aware of her dead self on a slab in the morgue, since everything around her is gray and amorphous.
So she's dead, because next thing that appears against the gray is God-- or someone she thinks must be God (that bearded, enthroned king image is what she is seeing... at that particular moment).
If that's God, then she must be in heaven? she queries.
She queries because if it is heaven, it's all just gray and God and her. "Where's everyone else?" she wonders out loud. "Why?" God asks, in a sort of set up that then plays out throughout the story. "What do you see?" God more or less asks; and Martha says "only you." God then implies that is Martha's vision situation (and that plays out throughout the story too because God goes from being a bearded old man to eventually being a middle-aged African American woman who says yes to a tuna fish sandwich, who Martha thinks could be her own twin and about which God is not so much amused as God is suggesting that Martha (and the reader) should spend some time thinking about how and why we imagine God as we do/need to.
You really need to read this short story to both enjoy Butler's way about certain issues (like What do we know and How do we know it and communicate/process/interpret it?) and then to ponder the issues.
These are important questions both for people of faith and for people who are wondering about faith (and if you are wondering about faith, then you are likely, also, wondering about doubt, too). For that matter, Butler, like the prophets of The Old Testament, might be trying to both comfort the oppressed (those oppressed by doubts) and challenge the comfortable (those too snug in their faith assumptions). For when you do take a sober look at all the violence and enslavement that continue in our world, one then does begin to ask, "What's Love got to do with It?" What does it mean to say we believe in a God who is Love in a world which is so full of un-love? That's not a new question. People ask that question a lot, and have through the ages.
However, what Butler does is pose the question in her narrative (without ever asking it) in such a way as to be able to speak to both the believer and non-believer at the same time. That's the big project at the heart of all Octavia Butler's writing: traversing the divide, not taking Us/Them as a given and, instead, trying to speak to both-- to uncover how we construct reality so as to assure and secure ourselves, and that such constructions often have blueprints that keep the other out.
In "The Book of Martha" Butler teases the reader about Heaven, God and Self (freedom, responsibility, control, power) so that when Martha gets sent back to earth, the reader is brought to an earthly contemplation of what we might mean by "God."
It is a very interesting read; a good way to apply a lens on our own faith texts--the beliefs we carry around inside ourselves and even within our community. Butler is not discounting faith, just challenging faith assumptions so that we do not have too ready an answer to the question "What's Love got to do with It?" She even embeds a Christ-figure in the narrative so as to suggest a response to the question. Can you spot it?
By the way, if you are wondering why "It" is capitalized, that's just me suggesting that not only do we need to consider what we think love is/means, we also need to ask ourselves what is the "It" to which we want God's love applied (e.g., What's love got to do with salvation, my trusting God, God's being good to/with/for me, health, happiness; as well as pain, suffering, things not turning out good etc)
Any thoughts? Leave a comment.
Need a copy of "The Book of Martha"?
Let me know and I can email it to you.
Friday, February 20, 2009
What's Love got to do with It?
at
10:47 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Ok, I'll pick up the ball & play
I'd like to believe that faith is not based on assumptions but assurances based on promises that have been made by God. I would not say that these assurances make me comfortable, but they are the basis of my hope. I believe that God wants us to trust Him to believe that we can rest on His promises.
Yes, the world is full of un-love, but this world is not eternal. There is another reality that is breaking in all the time, even is the most un-loving moments.
We are all both believers and unbelievers in God's promises. Sometimes it strains credulity to have faith that a loving God is alive in this world, or that He "has the whole world in His hands," but I suppose that I believe that on some levels we should have a pat answer for the question of "What Love has to do with it" because God is Love; He is passionately engaged in loving us, and as Christians we should always be prepared to give an account for the hope that lies within us. It is that very hope which we bring to others to comfort them when the un-loving world becomes so wearisome. Personally, I go to church to hear the story and be nourished by the sacraments, so that I can do exactly what we say we are going to do in the closing prayer, “to go forth into the world rejoicing in the power of the Spirit.” We are strengthened by God’s love so that we can give it away to others.
I love a good story. I especially love stories that provoke us to think about God. But I differentiate between stories and The Judeo-Christian Story, which has been given to us to help us understand who God is and what He wants from us. Thanks be to God, we do not have to construct reality so as to assure and secure ourselves. We have been given one. Life within the Judeo-Christian story is comfortable; how anyone could say that living in relationship with a God who is relentless about holiness, righteousness and justice is comfortable is beyond me.
I read the story twice. It left me with believing that we all see God in different forms. I have never envisioned God in a human form and I wonder about that. I have always felt God as an all encompassing being surrounding us. In answer to "What Love has to do with it", I felt that the author was saying that God always wants us filled with love and helping our fellow man but has given us free will to work that out ourselves. It also seemed to say that God has certain people chosen to help people find a way to "love and peace".
I found the story so intriguing. I won't get into the dream part, because I do have dreams which I remember vividly years later and they had a major effect on my life. What this means, I don't know. I was intrigued by the idea that life might be made better for people through dreams.
(This probably makes little sense to anyone but me)
I loved you analysis and Lori's analysis.
Post a Comment